AiMolSim
References

The Published Science Behind Every Number

121 papers, books, data sets and specifications our own code is built on, each one verified and marked by how far we have checked it.

A small research team in a library-style room, one person pointing at a wall display of connected document cards and a search bar
121

Sources cited by the engine

100

Of 101 journal papers in Web of Science SCIE journals

32

Checked line by line against the original

0

Retracted, on Crossref on 2026-10-19

How We Cite

Original Sources Only, Checked and Dated

Rules the whole team follows, for code, data files, reports and this page.

The Original Paper

Each method, table and constant cites the publication it comes from, down to the equation, table and page, in the code itself.

Never Software

The engine is our own code. We cite knowledge: papers, books, data and file-format specifications. No program is a source.

Checked Metadata

Authors, titles, volumes and pages come from Crossref. Journals are checked in the Web of Science Master Journal List, papers for retractions.

Honest Status

We say which sources we have checked line by line and which are credited but still being read. Unchecked data is labelled in every result.

Every Source, by Domain

Search by author, year, journal or method. Each entry says what the engine uses it for.

121 sources

Hartree-Fock and SCF

13
  1. Roothaan, C. C. J. (1951). New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 23, 69-89.

    Restricted Hartree-Fock (Roothaan equations)

  2. Hall, G. G. (1951). The molecular orbital theory of chemical valency VIII. A method of calculating ionization potentials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 205, 541-552.

    Restricted Hartree-Fock (Hall equations)

  3. Pople, J. A.; Nesbet, R. K. (1954). Self-Consistent Orbitals for Radicals. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 571-572.

    Unrestricted Hartree-Fock

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1740120 (opens in a new tab)
  4. Pulay, P. (1980). Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. The case of SCF iteration. Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 393-398.

    DIIS convergence acceleration

  5. Pulay, P. (1982). Improved SCF convergence acceleration. J. Comput. Chem. 3, 556-560.

    DIIS error vector for SCF

  6. Saunders, V. R.; Hillier, I. H. (1973). A “Level-Shifting” method for converging closed shell Hartree-Fock wave functions. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 7, 699-705.

    Level shifting for difficult SCF convergence

  7. Almlöf, J.; Faegri, K.; Korsell, K. (1982). Principles for a direct SCF approach to LICAO-MO ab-initio calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 3, 385-399.

    Direct SCF and incremental Fock builds

  8. Häser, M.; Ahlrichs, R. (1989). Improvements on the direct SCF method. J. Comput. Chem. 10, 104-111.

    Schwarz integral screening

  9. Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. (1977). Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XVIII. Constraints and stability in Hartree-Fock theory. J. Chem. Phys. 66, 3045-3050.

    Hartree-Fock stability analysis (RHF to UHF, real to complex)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.434318 (opens in a new tab)
  10. Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. (1996). Stability analysis for solutions of the closed shell Kohn-Sham equation. J. Chem. Phys. 104, 9047-9052.

    Kohn-Sham stability analysis

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.471637 (opens in a new tab)
  11. Davidson, E. R. (1975). The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. J. Comput. Phys. 17, 87-94.

    Davidson iterations for the lowest stability roots

  12. Mulliken, R. S. (1955). Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO-MO Molecular Wave Functions. I. J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1833-1840.

    Mulliken population analysis

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1740588 (opens in a new tab)
  13. Löwdin, P. (1950). On the Non-Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 18, 365-375.

    Symmetric (Lowdin) orthogonalisation

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1747632 (opens in a new tab)

Integrals

3
  1. Boys, S. F. (1950). Electronic wave functions - I. A general method of calculation for the stationary states of any molecular system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 542-554.

    Gaussian basis functions and the Boys function

  2. McMurchie, L. E.; Davidson, E. R. (1978). One- and two-electron integrals over cartesian gaussian functions. J. Comput. Phys. 26, 218-231.

    Integrals over Cartesian Gaussians, CPU and GPU

  3. Obara, S.; Saika, A. (1986). Efficient recursive computation of molecular integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions. J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3963-3974.

    Recurrence relations for the reference integral code

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.450106 (opens in a new tab)

Basis Sets

8
  1. Hehre, W. J.; Stewart, R. F.; Pople, J. A. (1969). Self-Consistent Molecular-Orbital Methods. I. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater-Type Atomic Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2657-2664.

    STO-3G, hydrogen to neon (Tables I and IX)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1672392 (opens in a new tab)
  2. Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Stewart, R. F.; Pople, J. A. (1970). Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. IV. Use of Gaussian Expansions of Slater-Type Orbitals. Extension to Second-Row Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 52, 2769-2773.

    STO-3G, sodium to argon (Tables I and IX)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1673374 (opens in a new tab)
  3. Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. J.; Pople, J. A. (1971). Self-Consistent Molecular-Orbital Methods. IX. An Extended Gaussian-Type Basis for Molecular-Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 54, 724-728.

    6-31G hydrogen functions and scale factors (Tables I and IV)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1674902 (opens in a new tab)
  4. Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. (1972). Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian-Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257-2261.

    6-31G carbon to fluorine (Table II)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1677527 (opens in a new tab)
  5. Weigend, F.; Ahlrichs, R. (2005). Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297.

    def2 basis sets, hydrogen to krypton (supplementary listings)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1039/b508541a (opens in a new tab)
  6. Weigend, F. (2006). Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1057.

    def2-universal-J auxiliary basis for RI-J

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1039/b515623h (opens in a new tab)
  7. Eichkorn, K.; Treutler, O.; Öhm, H.; Häser, M.; Ahlrichs, R. (1995). Auxiliary basis sets to approximate Coulomb potentials. Chem. Phys. Lett. 240, 283-290.

    RI-J Coulomb fitting

  8. Vahtras, O.; Almlöf, J.; Feyereisen, M. W. (1993). Integral approximations for LCAO-SCF calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 213, 514-518.

    Origin of the density-fitting approximation

Density Functional Theory

12
  1. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. (1965). Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133-A1138.

    Kohn-Sham equations

  2. Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). Note on Exchange Phenomena in the Thomas Atom. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 26, 376-385.

    Local density exchange

  3. Slater, J. C. (1951). A Simplification of the Hartree-Fock Method. Phys. Rev. 81, 385-390.

    Slater exchange

  4. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. (1980). Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200-1211.

    VWN5 and VWN RPA correlation (parameters checked)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1139/p80-159 (opens in a new tab)
  5. Becke, A. D. (1988). Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098-3100.

    B88 exchange (parameter checked)

  6. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. (1988). Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785-789.

    LYP correlation (constants checked, Eq. 3)

  7. Miehlich, B.; Savin, A.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. (1989). Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of Becke and Lee, Yang and Parr. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 200-206.

    LYP in the form without Laplacian terms

  8. Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. (1992). Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244-13249.

    PW92 correlation (Table I checked)

  9. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868.

    PBE exchange and correlation (constants checked)

  10. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. (1997). Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396-1396.

    PBE erratum

  11. Johnson, B. G.; Gill, P. M. W.; Pople, J. A. (1993). The performance of a family of density functional methods. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5612-5626.

    Analytic Kohn-Sham gradients (Eqs. 9 to 11, Appendix B) This check found an erratum, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9202 (1994), doi 10.1063/1.468507, not yet compared with our code (register item SI-104).

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.464906 (opens in a new tab)
  12. Grimme, S. (2006). Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787-1799.

    DFT-D2 dispersion (Table 1, Eqs. 10 to 13)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1002/jcc.20495 (opens in a new tab)

Integration Grids

3
  1. Becke, A. D. (1988). A multicenter numerical integration scheme for polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2547-2553.

    Multicentre integration grid

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.454033 (opens in a new tab)
  2. Treutler, O.; Ahlrichs, R. (1995). Efficient molecular numerical integration schemes. J. Chem. Phys. 102, 346-354.

    M4 radial grid and the 434-point angular rule (Tables I and II)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.469408 (opens in a new tab)
  3. Slater, J. C. (1964). Atomic Radii in Crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3199-3204.

    Bragg-Slater radii for grid partitioning (Table I)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.1725697 (opens in a new tab)

Geometry, Frequencies and Symmetry

12
  1. Broyden, C. G. (1970). The Convergence of a Class of Double-rank Minimization Algorithms 1. General Considerations. IMA J. Appl. Math. 6, 76-90.

    BFGS Hessian update

  2. Fletcher, R. (1970). A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput. J. 13, 317-322.

    BFGS Hessian update

  3. Goldfarb, D. (1970). A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math. Comp. 24, 23-26.

    BFGS Hessian update

  4. Shanno, D. F. (1970). Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math. Comp. 24, 647-656.

    BFGS Hessian update

  5. Liu, D. C.; Nocedal, J. (1989). On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program. 45, 503-528.

    L-BFGS minimisation

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1007/BF01589116 (opens in a new tab)
  6. Pulay, P. (1969). Ab initio calculation of force constants and equilibrium geometries in polyatomic molecules. Mol. Phys. 17, 197-204.

    Analytic gradients; force constants from gradient differences

  7. Richardson, L. F. (1911). IX. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 210, 307-357.

    Richardson extrapolation of frequencies

  8. Miller, W. H.; Handy, N. C.; Adams, J. E. (1980). Reaction path Hamiltonian for polyatomic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 72, 99-112.

    Projecting translations and rotations out of the Hessian

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.438959 (opens in a new tab)
  9. Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. (1996). Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree-Fock, Møller-Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 16502-16513.

    Frequency scale factors, used as a check

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/jp960976r (opens in a new tab)
  10. Beruski, O.; Vidal, L. N. (2014). Algorithms for computer detection of symmetry elements in molecular systems. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 290-299.

    Symmetry element search for point groups

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1002/jcc.23493 (opens in a new tab)
  11. Kabsch, W. (1976). A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Cryst. A 32, 922-923.

    Best rotation between two structures (RMSD)

  12. Horn, B. K. P. (1987). Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 629.

    Quaternion best-fit alignment

Molecular Mechanics

10
  1. Halgren, T. A. (1996). Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 490-519.

    MMFF94 form and parameters (Appendix B files checked)

  2. Halgren, T. A. (1996). Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 520-552.

    MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatics

  3. Halgren, T. A. (1996). Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 553-586.

    MMFF94 geometries and vibrational frequencies

  4. Halgren, T. A.; Nachbar, R. B. (1996). Merck molecular force field. IV. Conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 587-615.

    MMFF94 conformational energies (Table II checked)

  5. Halgren, T. A. (1996). Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 616-641.

    MMFF94 empirical rules (Tables VI and X checked)

  6. Halgren, T. A. (1992). The representation of van der Waals (vdW) interactions in molecular mechanics force fields: potential form, combination rules, and vdW parameters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 7827-7843.

    Buffered 14-7 van der Waals form

  7. Blondel, A.; Karplus, M. (1996). New formulation for derivatives of torsion angles and improper torsion angles in molecular mechanics: Elimination of singularities. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 1132-1141.

    Torsion angle derivatives

  8. Rappe, A. K.; Casewit, C. J.; Colwell, K. S.; Goddard, W. A.; Skiff, W. M. (1992). UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10024-10035.

    UFF force field: parameter table awaited, UFF runs refuse until it is checked

    Data pendingJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1021/ja00051a040 (opens in a new tab)
  9. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. (1980). Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity, a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 36, 3219-3228.

    Gasteiger-Marsili charges: parameter table awaited

  10. Halgren, T. A. (1998). MMFF94 Validation Suite (761 molecules with term energies). Computational Chemistry List archive.

    Energy validation of every MMFF94 term

Cheminformatics

20
  1. Weininger, D. (1988). SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31-36.

    SMILES reading and writing

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/ci00057a005 (opens in a new tab)
  2. Weininger, D.; Weininger, A.; Weininger, J. L. (1989). SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 29, 97-101.

    Canonical SMILES (CANON and GENES)

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/ci00062a008 (opens in a new tab)
  3. McKay, B. D.; Piperno, A. (2014). Practical graph isomorphism, II. J. Symb. Comput. 60, 94-112.

    Canonical labelling by individualisation and refinement

  4. Schneider, N.; Sayle, R. A.; Landrum, G. A. (2015). Get Your Atoms in Order: An Open-Source Implementation of a Novel and Robust Molecular Canonicalization Algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 2111-2120.

    Stereo-aware canonical ranking

  5. Hückel, E. (1931). Quantentheoretische Beiträge zum Benzolproblem. Z. Phys. 70, 204-286.

    Aromaticity by the 4n+2 rule In German.

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1007/BF01339530 (opens in a new tab)
  6. Rogers, D.; Hahn, M. (2010). Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 50, 742-754.

    ECFP4 circular fingerprints

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1021/ci100050t (opens in a new tab)
  7. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. (1998). Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38, 983-996.

    Tanimoto similarity

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/ci9800211 (opens in a new tab)
  8. Cordella, L. P.; Foggia, P.; Sansone, C.; Vento, M. (2004). A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 1367-1372.

    Substructure search

  9. Butina, D. (1999). Unsupervised Data Base Clustering Based on Daylight's Fingerprint and Tanimoto Similarity: A Fast and Automated Way To Cluster Small and Large Data Sets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 747-750.

    Butina clustering

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/ci9803381 (opens in a new tab)
  10. Kamada, T.; Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 31, 7-15.

    2D layout for drawings

  11. Havel, T. F.; Kuntz, I. D.; Crippen, G. M. (1983). The theory and practice of distance geometry. Bull. Math. Biol. 45, 665-720.

    3D structures by distance geometry

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1007/BF02460044 (opens in a new tab)
  12. Wildman, S. A.; Crippen, G. M. (1999). Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 868-873.

    Crippen logP: atom table not yet checked against Table 1, results say Unverified

    Data pendingJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/ci990307l (opens in a new tab)
  13. Ertl, P.; Rohde, B.; Selzer, P. (2000). Fast Calculation of Molecular Polar Surface Area as a Sum of Fragment-Based Contributions and Its Application to the Prediction of Drug Transport Properties. J. Med. Chem. 43, 3714-3717.

    TPSA: fragment table not yet checked against the paper, results say Unverified

    Data pendingJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1021/jm000942e (opens in a new tab)
  14. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. (1997). Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 23, 3-25.

    Rule of five, hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors

  15. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. (2002). Molecular Properties That Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem. 45, 2615-2623.

    Rotatable bonds

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1021/jm020017n (opens in a new tab)
  16. Pyykkö, P.; Atsumi, M. (2009). Molecular Single-Bond Covalent Radii for Elements 1-118. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 186-197.

    Single-bond covalent radii for 3D bounds

  17. Pyykkö, P.; Atsumi, M. (2009). Molecular Double-Bond Covalent Radii for Elements Li-E112. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 12770-12779.

    Double-bond covalent radii for 3D bounds

  18. Pyykkö, P.; Riedel, S.; Patzschke, M. (2005). Triple-Bond Covalent Radii. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3511-3520.

    Triple-bond covalent radii for 3D bounds

  19. Bondi, A. (1964). van der Waals Volumes and Radii. J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441-451.

    Van der Waals radii for distance bounds

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/j100785a001 (opens in a new tab)
  20. Cordero, B.; Gómez, V.; Platero-Prats, A. E.; Revés, M.; Echeverría, J.; Cremades, E.; et al. (2008). Covalent radii revisited. Dalton Trans., 2832.

    Covalent radii for structure checks (Table 2)

    CheckedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1039/b801115j (opens in a new tab)

Model Systems

8
  1. Colbert, D. T.; Miller, W. H. (1992). A novel discrete variable representation for quantum mechanical reactive scattering via the S-matrix Kohn method. J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1982-1991.

    Sinc discrete variable representation grids

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1063/1.462100 (opens in a new tab)
  2. Fornberg, B. (1988). Generation of finite difference formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids. Math. Comp. 51, 699-706.

    Finite-difference Laplacians

  3. Morse, P. M. (1929). Diatomic Molecules According to the Wave Mechanics. II. Vibrational Levels. Phys. Rev. 34, 57-64.

    Morse oscillator, exact levels for tests

  4. Eckart, C. (1930). The Penetration of a Potential Barrier by Electrons. Phys. Rev. 35, 1303-1309.

    Eckart barrier and its transmission

  5. Johnston, H. S.; Heicklen, J. (1962). Tunnelling corrections for unsymmetrical Eckart potential energy barriers. J. Phys. Chem. 66, 532-533.

    Tunnelling corrections for unsymmetrical Eckart barriers

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.1021/j100809a040 (opens in a new tab)
  6. Wigner, E. (1932). Über das Überschreiten von Potentialschwellen bei chemischen Reaktionen. Z. Phys. Chem. B 19B, 203-216.

    Wigner tunnelling correction In German.

  7. Feit, M. D.; Fleck, J. A.; Steiger, A. (1982). Solution of the Schrödinger equation by a spectral method. J. Comput. Phys. 47, 412-433.

    Split-operator wavepacket propagation

  8. Lanczos, C. (1950). An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 45, 255.

    Lanczos iteration for 2D and 3D grids

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIE*doi 10.6028/jres.045.026 (opens in a new tab)

Numerical Methods

9
  1. Cooley, J. W.; Tukey, J. W. (1965). An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math. Comp. 19, 297-301.

    Fast Fourier transform (radix 2)

  2. Bluestein, L. (1970). A linear filtering approach to the computation of discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 18, 451-455.

    Fourier transform of any length (chirp z)

  3. Stockham, T. G. (1966). High-speed convolution and correlation. AFIPS '66 Spring Joint Computer Conference, 229.

    Self-sorting FFT on the GPU

  4. Govindaraju, N. K.; Lloyd, B.; Dotsenko, Y.; Smith, B.; Manferdelli, J. (2008). High performance discrete Fourier transforms on graphics processors. SC08, International Conference for High Performance Computing, 1-12.

    FFT on graphics processors

  5. Householder, A. S. (1958). Unitary Triangularization of a Nonsymmetric Matrix. J. ACM 5, 339-342.

    Householder reduction

  6. Martin, R. S.; Reinsch, C.; Wilkinson, J. H. (1968). Householder's tridiagonalization of a symmetric matrix. Numer. Math. 11, 181-195.

    Householder tridiagonalisation

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1007/BF02161841 (opens in a new tab)
  7. Bowdler, H.; Martin, R. S.; Reinsch, C.; Wilkinson, J. H. (1968). The QR and QL algorithms for symmetric matrices. Numer. Math. 11, 293-306.

    QL iterations for symmetric eigenproblems

    CreditedJournal paperWoS SCIEdoi 10.1007/BF02166681 (opens in a new tab)
  8. Jacobi, C. G. J. (1846). Über ein leichtes Verfahren die in der Theorie der Säcularstörungen vorkommenden Gleichungen numerisch aufzulösen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1846, 51-94.

    Jacobi eigenvalue method (fallback) In German.

  9. Matsumoto, M.; Nishimura, T. (1998). Mersenne twister. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 8, 3-30.

    Random numbers for conformer search and tests

Reference Data and Constants

8
  1. Tiesinga, E.; Mohr, P. J.; Newell, D. B.; Taylor, B. N. (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93.

    CODATA 2018 constants (extracted from the NIST file)

  2. Prohaska, T.; Irrgeher, J.; Benefield, J.; Böhlke, J. K.; Chesson, L. A.; Coplen, T. B.; et al. (2022). Standard atomic weights of the elements 2021 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 94, 573-600.

    Standard atomic weights

  3. IUPAC CIAAW (2025). Standard atomic weights of three technology critical elements revised. Chem. Int. 47, 20-20.

    2024 revision of gadolinium, lutetium and zirconium

  4. Meija, J.; Coplen, T. B.; Berglund, M.; Brand, W. A.; De Bièvre, P.; Gröning, M.; et al. (2016). Isotopic compositions of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 88, 293-306.

    Isotopic compositions

  5. Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Kondev, F. G.; Audi, G.; Naimi, S. (2021). The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chinese Phys. C 45, 030003.

    AME2020 atomic and nuclide masses

  6. Kim, S.; Chen, J.; Cheng, T.; Gindulyte, A.; He, J.; He, S.; et al. (2023). PubChem 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1373-D1380.

    Weights, TPSA and rotatable bonds, used as a check

  7. Huber, K. P.; Herzberg, G. (1979). Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules. Van Nostrand Reinhold; values as served by the NIST Chemistry WebBook.

    Hydrogen spectroscopic constants for Model Systems tests

  8. NIST. Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Point group reference set, 27 of 27 molecules

Standards and File Formats

5
  1. OpenSMILES. OpenSMILES Specification, Version 1.0. opensmiles.org.

    Stereo marks, isotopes and valence rules in SMILES

  2. BIOVIA (2020). CTfile Formats. Dassault Systemes BIOVIA.

    MOL and SDF files, V2000 and V3000

    CheckedSpecification
  3. wwPDB. Atomic Coordinate Entry Format Description, Version 3.30. Worldwide Protein Data Bank.

    PDB files

  4. Bray, T. (ed.) (2017). The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format. IETF RFC 8259.

    Engine input and result files

  5. NIST (2015). Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4. National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Checksums on every data file and cache key

Textbooks

10
  1. Szabo, A.; Ostlund, N. S. (1996). Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory. Dover.

    Hartree-Fock theory; hydrogen molecule value in tests

    CreditedBookISBN 978-0-486-69186-2
  2. Helgaker, T.; Jorgensen, P.; Olsen, J. (2000). Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory. Wiley.

    Integral recurrences and the Boys function

    CreditedBookISBN 978-0-471-96755-2
  3. Hehre, W. J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J. A. (1986). Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. Wiley.

    Hartree-Fock methods and basis sets

    CreditedBookISBN 0-471-81241-2
  4. Wilson, E. B.; Decius, J. C.; Cross, P. C. (1980). Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra. Dover reprint.

    Normal-mode analysis

    CreditedBookISBN 0-486-63941-X
  5. Cotton, F. A. (1990). Chemical Applications of Group Theory, 3rd ed.. Wiley.

    Point group flow chart (chapter 3)

    CreditedBookISBN 0-471-51094-7
  6. Golub, G. H.; Van Loan, C. F. (2013). Matrix Computations, 4th ed.. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Cholesky, Lanczos and matrix exponential

    CreditedBookISBN 978-1-4214-0794-4
  7. Nocedal, J.; Wright, S. J. (2006). Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed.. Springer.

    Line search and L-BFGS details

    CreditedBookISBN 978-0-387-30303-1
  8. Crippen, G. M.; Havel, T. F. (1988). Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation. Research Studies Press and Wiley.

    3D embedding

    CreditedBookISBN 0-471-92061-4
  9. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. (2017). Computer Simulation of Liquids, 2nd ed.. Oxford University Press.

    Force-field topology (bonds, angles, 1-4 pairs)

    CreditedBookISBN 978-0-19-880319-5
  10. Rall, L. B. (1981). Automatic Differentiation: Techniques and Applications (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 120). Springer.

    Exact derivatives by dual numbers

Fact Check, 2026-10-19

How This List Was Checked

  • All 107 DOIs resolve on Crossref; authors, titles, journals, volumes, pages and years on this page are Crossref's
  • 100 of 101 journal papers appeared in journals now in the Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index Expanded), 21 of them under the journal's direct successor title (marked *); the other is an IUPAC notice in Chemistry International
  • No retraction or expression of concern on any paper
  • One erratum found that our code did not cite yet (Johnson, Gill & Pople 1993); it is logged as register item SI-104 and will be checked
  • All 10 book ISBNs matched in Open Library
  • 3 originals are in German (Hückel 1931, Wigner 1932, Jacobi 1846); we cite them because they are the originals

How to Cite an AiMolSim Result

There is no AiMolSim journal paper yet. Cite the method papers the result names, plus the engine version and cache key:

Hartree-Fock/STO-3G (Roothaan 1951; Hehre, Stewart & Pople 1969), computed with the VYROX Chemistry Engine 0.7.13, cache key vce-cache-1:<key>.

Every Chemistry Lab report prints its Methods sentence with these citations, and every result stores its cache key.

Not on This List

Software. Programs we compare against run only in a separate test environment and are named on the Validation page. Sources for planned features join when the feature ships.

Reference Questions

Why publish a reference list at all?
Because a computed number is only as trustworthy as the method and the data behind it. Every method, parameter table and constant in our engine names its original publication, and this page lists all of them with their current check status.
What do Checked, Credited and Data pending mean?
Checked: the team read the original and checked the data or equations against it line by line. Credited: the method is credited to its original publication and our code is proven by self-tests and exact answers; the line-by-line reading of the full text is still in progress. Data pending: a published table is not yet checked against the paper (results say Unverified), or is still awaited, in which case that feature refuses to run.
Why are no software packages listed?
The VYROX Chemistry Engine is our own code. We cite where the knowledge comes from: papers, books, reference data and file-format specifications. Programs we compare against in a separate test environment are named on the Validation page, never as sources.
How should I cite a result computed with AiMolSim?
There is no AiMolSim journal paper yet. Cite the method and basis-set papers that the result's Methods sentence names (every Chemistry Lab report prints it), and give the engine version and the result's cache key so the run can be traced.
Can I download the papers from you?
No. We cite, we do not redistribute. Every DOI links to the publisher's page; books are listed with their ISBN.
Is this list complete?
It lists every source cited by the engine 0.7.13 source code and data files, plus the active entries of the Chemistry Lab source registry. Sources for planned features (hybrid functionals, solvation, molecular dynamics) join the list when the feature ships, not before.

Run Your Next Molecule Through AiMolSim

Sign in, describe a molecule and the question you have, and approve the plan the assistant proposes. Or request a demo first.